Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Orr's avatar

The longer the beast has resisted challenge, the stronger it has become. The ideological basis for gender identity ( and its extension, to “ fluidity “) well deserves its overdue confrontation and acknowledgement as the social science cull de sac into which Medicine has been inexplicably lead. Linguistic manipulation of the social activists has been an effective tool , by taking their lead, as perhaps , as we recently might have seen suggested, replacing “ gender incongruity/ dysphoria “ with “ transgender ideation “ would be a good start?

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

To whom you are attracted sexually is purely subjective and therefore cannot reasonably be contested by an outside observer.

Where you decide to live your life on a spectrum of superficial, stereotypical male to female attributes (and we all do) is also purely subjective and similarly cannot be questioned.

However, your biological sex reflects an objective reality which cannot be changed by your subjective personal view and futile attempts to do so can result in serious health impacts to you as well as harms to members of the sex you are impersonating (primarily women).

Others who are grounded in objective reality should never be forced to accept your subjective version of your actual biological sex.

Finally, it's past time for the LGB community to separate themselves from the trans activists who are trying to take away the rights of women to fairness in sports and to privacy and safety in their restrooms, locker rooms and prisons. They also advocate for the chemical and surgical mutilation of children many of whom would grow up gay.

Their actions are evil and the

understandable negative reaction to the harm they are causing is spilling over to innocent people who are just going about their business, marrying and leading their lives.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts